Kil · Värmland
Allmänmedicinska mottagningen vårdcentralen Kil has a Vårdbetyg of 73.2 out of 100 (an average score), based on 99 responses in the National Patient Survey 2025. That is 5.0 points below the national average (78.2).
Updated with the National Patient Survey 2025
Vårdbetyg
5,0 below the national average (78,2)
Based on 99 responses
Combined from 6 survey dimensions and adjusted toward the national average based on 99 responses. How we calculate it.
The survey dimensions average 71,7, shrunk toward the national average (78,2) by 99 responses to 73,2. Accessibility data is missing, so the rating rests on patient experience alone.
Patient experience builds on the unit’s own answers about 77 %; the rest is drawn toward the national average for patient experience (78,2) because 99patients answered. Fewer answers means a stronger pull, so a thin basis can’t top the ranking on chance.
The Vårdbetyg normally combines patient experience (70%) with accessibility (30%); this unit lacks waiting-time data, so its score rests entirely on patient experience from the National Patient Survey 2025, with Bayesian shrinkage toward the national average. How the score is calculated.
What the symbols mean:
The wider the line around the dot, the less certain the figure, usually because fewer people responded. Read more in the methodology.
Municipality 76,1 · Region 76,7
Municipality 81,9 · Region 81,8
Municipality 78,6 · Region 76,9
Municipality 68,6 · Region 71,6
Municipality 60,8 · Region 65,9
Municipality 64,3 · Region 79,7
Three questions many people ask when choosing, answered with the same open figures shown on this page. No new measures, no new score.
Continuity in the patient survey: 60,8 – below the national average (70,4) · 94 responses
The share with a named regular doctor is not available as open data for this region.
Waiting-time data is not available for this unit.
Involvement: 78,6 – in line with the national average (80,4)
Information: 68,6 – below the national average (74,8)
These are patterns in open data, not judgements about staff or intentions. Differences from the national average can have many explanations, and the figures say nothing about why they look the way they do. What we cannot measure is listed under What we can’t measure.
How many responses the Vårdbetyg is built on. More responses give a more reliable result.
Independence: no care provider pays for placement or scores on Vårdbetyg, and we carry no sponsorship and no booking commission. The scores are calculated solely from open, year-stamped sources – the National Patient Survey 2025 and the National Board of Health and Welfare’s waiting-time statistics – never from submitted reviews. How we stay independent.
Below are facts and context. None of it counts toward the Vårdbetyg.
Allmänmedicinska mottagningen vårdcentralen Kil scores 73.2 out of 100 on Vårdbetyg, below the national average of 78.2, based on 99 responses with a 50% response rate. Respect and empathy is the strongest dimension at 81.9, close to the national average of 83.9, while accessibility is notably weak at 64.3 against a national average of 80.2, and continuity also lags at 60.8 versus 70.4 nationally. With around 100 responses and a moderate response rate, results give a reasonable indication of patient experience but leave some uncertainty at the individual dimension level.
Automatically generated summary, grounded in the figures on this page (the patient survey 2025).
Ratings and reviews: the Vårdbetyg above is built on patient ratings from the National Patient Survey, a systematic survey that outweighs individual reviews. Fresh Google reviews appear as a standalone complement when available.
Share of the region’s primary-care diabetes patients reaching the target value, from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (2024). The row on high blood-sugar level is the exception and instead shows the share above 70 mmol/mol.
This is regional context, not this health centre’s own figures.
Source: the Swedish National Diabetes Register via Vården i siffror.
Antibiotic prescriptions per 1,000 inhabitants in the region’s outpatient care. Strama’s target is at most 250 prescriptions per 1,000 inhabitants per year (2025).
This is regional context, not this health centre’s own figures. Lower is better.
Source: the Public Health Agency of Sweden, antibiotics statistics.
Complaints to IVO about primary care in the region that were investigated on the merits, and how many were closed with criticism, in total 2018-2025.
This is regional context, not this health centre’s own figures. IVO investigates only a small share of all complaints on the merits (most go to the patient committee), and the count also reflects the region’s size, so it is not a quality ranking. Small counts are suppressed at the source, so the figure is a lower bound.
Source: the Health and Social Care Inspectorate, IVO statistics database (table EKPSL09, primary care).
Vårdbetyg is built only on open, year-stamped sources. Some of what patients care about most is not in any open data per health centre. When that is the case we say so plainly instead of guessing.
A missing figure like this does notmean anything is wrong with this particular health centre, only that it can’t be measured fairly in open data. We never put a number or a judgement on something we can’t substantiate, and never single out an individual clinic on a guess.
Have a concern about a specific health centre? Your region’s patient advisory committee (patientnämnden) receives it free of charge, and serious deficiencies can be reported to IVO.
Which of these would you most like to know?
We only count how many press each option. The answer is about the question, not about this health centre.
Health centres in the county with the closest Vårdbetyg, in other municipalities.
Proud of your rating? Copy the code and show the Vårdbetyg on your own website. The badge updates automatically when new data arrives and links back here. No cookie, no tracking.
Allmänmedicinska mottagningen vårdcentralen Kil has a Vårdbetyg score of 73.2 out of 100, which is an average score. The Vårdbetyg normally combines patient experience with accessibility, but this health centre has no waiting-time data, so its score rests entirely on patients' answers in the National Patient Survey 2025.
The Vårdbetyg weights patient experience (the National Patient Survey answers) at 70% and accessibility (waiting times from the National Board of Health and Welfare) at 30%. Before the parts are combined, each is shrunk Bayesianly toward its own national average, patient experience by how many people responded and accessibility by how many cases the waiting times are based on. The combined score is not shrunk a second time. A health centre with a thin basis therefore cannot top the ranking on statistical noise. The method is open. When a health centre has no waiting-time data the weights are recomputed so the score rests entirely on patient experience, which is the case here. A missing part never drags the score down.
The Vårdbetyg for Allmänmedicinska mottagningen vårdcentralen Kil is based on 99 patients who responded to the National Patient Survey 2025. That corresponds to a response rate of 50%. We always show the number of responses and the confidence interval next to the score, so the reliability of the basis is clear.
Source: National Patient Survey 2025 (SKR). Open data at resultat.patientenkat.se.