Capio Vårdcentral Ängelholm

Operating form

Private

Address

Bruksgatan 25, Ängelholm

Source: Region Skåne (open data).

Share of listed patients with a named doctor

81%

Listed patients

10,169

A full count from the region’s listing register at the extract date (Q3 2026), not a survey or a rating. It shows who patients are listed with, not necessarily who they see at each visit. A low share can reflect how the clinic registers listings, and a unit with many elderly or chronically ill patients can have a structurally higher share. In some regions nearly all patients are listed with a named doctor, so the share sits close to 100% for most.

Source: the region’s listing register, released public record. How the measure is derived in the methodology.

Share who saw the same doctor more than half of their visits

33%

Sample (more than three doctor visits in six months)

19 of 57 patients

The region’s continuity index, a follow-up figure and not a rating: the share of patients who saw the same doctor more than half of their visits, among patients with more than three physical doctor visits during March 2026–August 2026. Unlike named GP contact (who you are listed with), it measures who patients actually saw. The sample is small at many units, so the figure is an indication rather than an exact truth; we only show it when at least 30 patients are included.

Source: Region Skåne’s primary-care quality follow-up (indicator 3.2), released public record. How the measure is derived in the methodology.

Capio Vårdcentral Ängelholm scores 78.9 of 100 on the Vårdbetyg, slightly below the national average of 81.2, based on 90 survey responses with a 45% response rate, so results should be read with some caution given the moderate sample size. Across the survey dimensions, all areas fall below national averages, with Respect and empathy showing the largest gap (77.3 vs. 84 nationally), while Continuity (68.2 vs. 70.5) and Information (71.9 vs. 74.9) are closer to typical levels. Waiting-time data show all calls were answered on first contact (100%), though only 76% of patients received a medical assessment within 3 days, a somewhat lower share than many centres report.

Automatically generated summary, grounded in the figures on this page (the patient survey 2025).

How many in 100 of the practice’s asthma and COPD patients in the Swedish Airway Register (Luftvägsregistret) received the follow-up the guidelines recommend in 2025. The figures describe how follow-up is done, not how good the care is for any one patient, and they are not part of the Vårdbetyg.

Patient counts are rounded to the nearest ten in the source. When fewer than 20 patients are included, or when the register itself has hidden the figure, the row says the patients are too few instead.

Source: Luftvägsregistret (2025). Open data via https://vardenisiffror.se/. What to consider when reading the figures (in Swedish)

Figures for the whole region, never this health centre's own.

Vårdbetyg is built only on open, year-stamped sources. Some of what patients care about most is not in any open data per health centre. When that is the case we say so plainly instead of guessing.

• Whether a clinic offers or upsells private add-ons.
• How often it refers or passes you on instead of caring for you itself.
• Whether it profits from rebooking you.

The Swedish National Diabetes Register does not publish its results per health centre as open data. In October 2026 we asked the register whether we may show them. The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SKR) publishes PrimärvårdsKvalitet, which among other things measures whether patients have a named regular doctor, only per region. For figures per health centre, SKR refers to the regions.

A missing figure like this does not mean anything is wrong with this particular health centre, only that it can’t be measured fairly in open data. We never put a number or a judgement on something we can’t substantiate, and never single out an individual clinic on a guess.

Have a concern about a specific health centre? Your region’s patient advisory committee (patientnämnden) receives it free of charge, and serious deficiencies can be reported to IVO.