Capio Vårdcentral Ystad

Facts about the health centre.

Operating form

Private

Address

Missunnavägen 7A, Ystad

Source: Region Skåne (open data).

Share of listed patients with a named doctor

78%

Listed patients

12,909

A full count from the region’s listing register at the extract date (Q2 2026), not a survey or a rating. It shows who patients are listed with, not necessarily who they see at each visit. A low share can reflect how the clinic registers listings, and a unit with many elderly or chronically ill patients can have a structurally higher share. In some regions nearly all patients are listed with a named doctor, so the share sits close to 100% for most. Not part of the Vårdbetyg score.

Source: the region’s listing register, released public record. How the measure is derived in the methodology.

Share who saw the same doctor more than half of their visits

33%

Sample (more than three doctor visits in six months)

67 of 205 patients

The region’s continuity index: the share of patients who saw the same doctor more than half of their visits, among patients with more than three physical doctor visits during March 2026–August 2026. Unlike named GP contact (who you are listed with), it measures who patients actually saw. The sample is small at many units, so the figure is an indication rather than an exact truth; we only show it when at least 30 patients are included. Not part of the Vårdbetyg score.

Source: Region Skåne’s primary-care quality follow-up (indicator 3.2), released public record. How the measure is derived in the methodology.

Capio Vårdcentral Ystad scores 83.3 on Vårdbetyg, above the national average of 81.5, based on 160 survey responses with a 54% response rate. Its clear strength is accessibility: patients rated it 87 versus the national 80.2, and waiting-time data support this, with 93% getting a medical assessment within 3 days and all first-contact calls answered. The weakest dimension is continuity at 67.8, below the national average of 70.5, and other dimensions like care and treatment (76.5) and involvement (77.5) also sit slightly under the national figures. With 160 responses and a 54% response rate, the patient-experience figures give a reasonably solid picture, though some uncertainty remains as with any survey-based measure.

Automatically generated summary, grounded in the figures on this page (the patient survey 2025).

Share of the region’s primary-care diabetes patients reaching the target value, from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (2024). The row on high blood-sugar level is the exception and instead shows the share above 70 mmol/mol.

Good blood-sugar control (HbA1c < 52 mmol/mol)

61%

High blood-sugar level (HbA1c > 70 mmol/mol), lower is better

8%

Blood pressure below 140/85 mmHg

56%

Foot examination performed

70%

Lipid-lowering treatment

83%

This is regional context, not this health centre’s own figures.

Source: the Swedish National Diabetes Register via Vården i siffror.

Antibiotic prescriptions per 1,000 inhabitants in the region’s outpatient care. Strama’s target is at most 250 prescriptions per 1,000 inhabitants per year (2025).

Antibiotic prescriptions per 1,000 inhabitants

277

This is regional context, not this health centre’s own figures. Lower is better.

Source: the Public Health Agency of Sweden, antibiotics statistics.

Complaints to IVO about primary care in the region that were investigated on the merits, and how many were closed with criticism, in total 2018-2025.

Complaints investigated on the merits (total)

270

Of which closed with criticism

118

This is regional context, not this health centre’s own figures. IVO investigates only a small share of all complaints on the merits (most go to the patient committee), and the count also reflects the region’s size, so it is not a quality ranking. Small counts are suppressed at the source, so the figure is a lower bound.

Source: the Health and Social Care Inspectorate, IVO statistics database (table EKPSL09, primary care).

Concerns about primary care submitted to the region’s patient advisory committee (2025), and the areas they most often relate to.

Complaints about health centres (total)

2,400

Health centres with at least one case

173 of 182

Share concerning examination/assessment

27%

Share concerning staff attitude

15%

Share concerning accessibility

8%

This is regional context, not this health centre’s own figures. A case is a submitted concern, not a verified deficiency, and the count also reflects the region’s size. The counts cover health centres, not other primary care (rehab, child health services and so on), and health centres without cases are not part of the extract. Shares refer to categorisations in the region’s own scheme; one case can concern several areas.

Source: the region’s patient advisory committee, released public record.

Vårdbetyg is built only on open, year-stamped sources. Some of what patients care about most is not in any open data per health centre. When that is the case we say so plainly instead of guessing.

• Whether a clinic offers or upsells private add-ons.
• How often it refers or passes you on instead of caring for you itself.
• Whether it profits from rebooking you.

A missing figure like this does not mean anything is wrong with this particular health centre, only that it can’t be measured fairly in open data. We never put a number or a judgement on something we can’t substantiate, and never single out an individual clinic on a guess.

Have a concern about a specific health centre? Your region’s patient advisory committee (patientnämnden) receives it free of charge, and serious deficiencies can be reported to IVO.