Loading health centre …
VårdbetygVårdbetygStockholm · Stockholm
Lill-Jans husläkarmottagning has a Vårdbetyg of 82.2 out of 100 (a high score), based on 112 responses in the National Patient Survey 2025. That is 4.0 points above the national average (78.2), and rank 77 of 96 rated health centres in Stockholm.
The Vårdbetyg is not a raw average of the responses. Few responses are pulled toward the national average, so a high average on thin evidence cannot top the ranking by chance. How we calculate it
Updated with the National Patient Survey 2025
Vårdbetyg
4.0 above the national average (78.2)
Based on 112 responses
Combined from 6 survey dimensions and adjusted toward the national average based on 112 responses. How we calculate it.
The survey dimensions average 83.3, shrunk toward the national average (78.2) by 112 responses to 82.2. Accessibility data is missing, so the rating rests on patient experience alone.
Patient experience builds on the unit’s own answers about 79 %; the rest is drawn toward the national average for patient experience (78.2) because 112 patients answered. Fewer answers means a stronger pull, so a thin basis can’t top the ranking on chance.
The Vårdbetyg normally combines patient experience (70%) with accessibility (30%); this unit lacks waiting-time data, so its score rests entirely on patient experience from the National Patient Survey 2025. Here you also find what a survey does not show: contact details, opening hours and e-services. How the score is calculated.
What the symbols mean:
The wider the line around the dot, the less certain the figure, usually because fewer people responded. Read more in the methodology.
Municipality 81.6 · Region 81.1
Municipality 85.5 · Region 85.1
Municipality 83.0 · Region 82.4
Municipality 78.1 · Region 77.4
Municipality 75.0 · Region 74.0
Municipality 79.4 · Region 80.3
Each dimension is built from several survey questions. Here are the individual questions and how patients answered. This is added depth; none of it counts toward the Vårdbetyg.
How did you experience the care you received during the visit?
112 answers to this question
How much trust did you have in the doctor?
112 answers to this question
Did you feel that the doctor took you and your health problems seriously?
112 answers to this question
What was your experience of how the doctor treated you?
112 answers to this question
How did you feel that the doctor listened to you?
112 answers to this question
How did you experience the opportunity to be involved in your care?
112 answers to this question
What is your experience of being able to ask questions?
111 answers to this question
How did you experience the opportunity for relatives to be involved in your care as much as you wanted?
112 answers to this question
Did you receive information that suited you?
112 answers to this question
What did you think about the information regarding the next steps?
109 answers to this question
How well informed did you feel the doctor was about your medical history and previous care?
112 answers to this question
How did you experience the opportunity to see a doctor you had seen before?
111 answers to this question
How did you experience that the coordination with other care and services worked?
111 answers to this question
How did you experience the waiting time until you could visit the health/medical center?
112 answers to this question
How do you think it works to get in touch with the health/medical center?
111 answers to this question
The figure is the same 0–100 scale as the dimensions above, per question. The triangle marks the national average. The distribution includes the Not applicable / Don’t know answer, so the bars add up to 100 %. No per-question figure affects the Vårdbetyg.
Three questions many people ask when choosing, answered with the same open figures shown on this page. No new measures, no new score.
Continuity in the patient survey: 76.6 – above the national average (70.5) · 105 responses
Share of listed patients with a named regular doctor: 85% (April 2026)
Waiting-time data is not available for this unit.
Involvement: 86.9 – above the national average (80.4)
Information: 82.7 – above the national average (74.9)
These are patterns in open data, not judgements about staff or intentions. Differences from the national average can have many explanations, and the figures say nothing about why they look the way they do. What we cannot measure is listed under What we can’t measure.
The results held steady 2015–2024.
From the National Patient Survey. The survey was redesigned in 2025 with new questions and response scales, so the 2025 value is a new starting point and is not compared with earlier years. The curve therefore breaks at the change and 2025 is shown separately. The trend above covers Primärvård (2015-2024). Years without a survey are left blank, we never guess. Small ups and downs that could just as well reflect who happened to respond count as unchanged, not as a change.
Where the municipality has at least 3 primary care units with comparable measurements, the municipal average is shown as a dashed reference line. The average is calculated on the same units throughout the series.
The municipal average in Stockholm is unchanged 2015–2024 (average of 58 primary care units).
The municipal average in Stockholm rose 2015–2024 (average of 58 primary care units).
The municipal average in Stockholm is unchanged 2015–2024 (average of 58 primary care units).
The municipal average in Stockholm is unchanged 2015–2024 (average of 58 primary care units).
The municipal average in Stockholm fell 2015–2024 (average of 58 primary care units).
Not measured in the 2025 survey.
Not measured in the 2025 survey.
How many responses the Vårdbetyg is built on. More responses give a more reliable result.
Independence: no care provider pays for placement or scores on Vårdbetyg, and we carry no sponsorship and no booking commission. The scores are calculated solely from open, year-stamped sources – the National Patient Survey 2025 and the National Board of Health and Welfare’s waiting-time statistics – never from submitted reviews. How we stay independent.
Below are facts and context. None of it counts toward the Vårdbetyg.
Facts about the health centre.
Source: 1177 Hitta vård (the HSA catalogue).
A full count from the region’s listing register at the extract date (April 2026), not a survey or a rating. It shows who patients are listed with, not necessarily who they see at each visit. A low share can reflect how the clinic registers listings, and a unit with many elderly or chronically ill patients can have a structurally higher share. In some regions nearly all patients are listed with a named doctor, so the share sits close to 100% for most. Not part of the Vårdbetyg score.
Source: the region’s listing register, released public record. How the measure is derived in the methodology.
Contact details and opening hours from 1177. Not part of the Vårdbetyg score.
Register with Lill-Jans husläkarmottagning (1177.se)
Source: 1177 Hitta vård (the HSA catalogue), retrieved 18 August 2026. Details may change – check 1177.se.
The health centre's address and location.
Lill-Jans husläkarmottagning scores 82.2 out of 100 on Vårdbetyg, above the national average of 78.2, based on 112 survey responses with a 56% response rate. Patients rate Respect and empathy highest (90.8 vs. 83.9 nationally), while Accessibility is the weakest dimension at 75.4, falling below the national average of 80.2. All other measured dimensions, including Care and treatment, Involvement, Information, and Continuity, exceed national averages. With a moderate sample size, these figures give a reasonably solid picture, though some variation should be expected with any survey of this scale.
Automatically generated summary, grounded in the figures on this page (the patient survey 2025).
Share of the region’s primary-care diabetes patients reaching the target value, from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (2024). The row on high blood-sugar level is the exception and instead shows the share above 70 mmol/mol.
This is regional context, not this health centre’s own figures.
Source: the Swedish National Diabetes Register via Vården i siffror.
Antibiotic prescriptions per 1,000 inhabitants in the region’s outpatient care. Strama’s target is at most 250 prescriptions per 1,000 inhabitants per year (2025).
This is regional context, not this health centre’s own figures. Lower is better.
Source: the Public Health Agency of Sweden, antibiotics statistics.
Complaints to IVO about primary care in the region that were investigated on the merits, and how many were closed with criticism, in total 2018-2025.
This is regional context, not this health centre’s own figures. IVO investigates only a small share of all complaints on the merits (most go to the patient committee), and the count also reflects the region’s size, so it is not a quality ranking. Small counts are suppressed at the source, so the figure is a lower bound.
Source: the Health and Social Care Inspectorate, IVO statistics database (table EKPSL09, primary care).
Concerns about primary care submitted to the region’s patient advisory committee (2025), and the areas they most often relate to.
This is regional context, not this health centre’s own figures. A case is a submitted concern, not a verified deficiency, and the count also reflects the region’s size. The counts cover health centres, not other primary care (rehab, child health services and so on), and health centres without cases are not part of the extract. Shares refer to categorisations in the region’s own scheme; one case can concern several areas.
Source: the region’s patient advisory committee, released public record.
Vårdbetyg is built only on open, year-stamped sources. Some of what patients care about most is not in any open data per health centre. When that is the case we say so plainly instead of guessing.
A missing figure like this does not mean anything is wrong with this particular health centre, only that it can’t be measured fairly in open data. We never put a number or a judgement on something we can’t substantiate, and never single out an individual clinic on a guess.
Have a concern about a specific health centre? Your region’s patient advisory committee (patientnämnden) receives it free of charge, and serious deficiencies can be reported to IVO.
Which of these would you most like to know?
We only count how many press each option. The answer is about the question, not about this health centre.
The Vårdbetyg above is built on patient ratings from the National Patient Survey, a systematic survey that outweighs individual reviews. Fresh Google reviews appear as a standalone complement when available.
Health centres in the county with the closest Vårdbetyg, in other municipalities.
Proud of your rating? Copy the code and show the Vårdbetyg on your own website. The badge updates automatically when new data arrives and links back here. No cookie, no tracking.
This is how the badge looks.Lill-Jans husläkarmottagning has a Vårdbetyg score of 82.2 out of 100, which is a high score. The Vårdbetyg normally combines patient experience with accessibility, but this health centre has no waiting-time data, so its score rests entirely on patients' answers in the National Patient Survey 2025.
The Vårdbetyg weights patient experience (the National Patient Survey answers) at 70% and accessibility (waiting times from the National Board of Health and Welfare) at 30%. Before the parts are combined, each is pulled toward its own national average when the basis is small (the method is called Bayesian shrinkage), patient experience by how many people responded and accessibility by how many cases the waiting times are based on. The combined score is not adjusted a second time. A health centre with a thin basis should therefore not be able to top the ranking by chance. The method is open. When a health centre has no waiting-time data the weights are recomputed so the score rests entirely on patient experience, which is the case here. A missing part never drags the score down.
The Vårdbetyg for Lill-Jans husläkarmottagning is based on 112 patients who responded to the National Patient Survey 2025. That corresponds to a response rate of 56%. We always show the number of responses and the margin of error next to the score, so it is clear how solid the basis is.
Source: National Patient Survey 2025 (SKR). Open data at resultat.patientenkat.se.