Loading health centre …
Enköping · Uppsala
Örsundsbro vårdcentral
Örsundsbro vårdcentral has a Vårdbetyg of 83.0 out of 100 (a high score), based on 94 responses in the National Patient Survey 2025. That is 1.8 points above the national average (81.2), and shared rank 2 of 7 rated health centres in Enköping. 78% of patients get a medical assessment within 3 days (August 2026).
Updated with the National Patient Survey 2025 · Waiting times: August 2026
Vårdbetyg
Vårdbetyg
83.0/ 100High score
1.8 above the national average (81.2)
Based on 94 responses from 150 patients asked (63%)
Cannot be told apart from the national average
The margin of error for patients' answers reaches the national average, so the difference may come down to who happened to answer. How to read the margin of error.
Where Örsundsbro vårdcentral sits in the whole distribution
Combined from patient experience (80.9, from the patient survey) and accessibility (87.9, from waiting times), adjusted toward the national average. How we calculate it.
Why this rating?
Two parts, each first shrunk toward the national average by how many answered, then weighted:
- Patient experience80.9 · weight 70 %
- Accessibility87.9 · weight 30 %
Combined rating 83.0
Patient experience builds on the unit’s own answers about 76 %; the rest is drawn toward the national average for patient experience (78.2) because 94 patients answered. Fewer answers means a stronger pull, so a thin basis can’t top the ranking on chance. Worked example: raw mean vs Vårdbetyg.
- Top-rated in Enköping 2026
Do you run this practice? Embed the rating on your website
At a glance
Vaccination against flu and COVID-19
In Region Uppsala, vaccinations start on 2 November. 1177 explains who is offered the vaccine and what it costs.
Read about the vaccination in Region Uppsala on 1177 (in Swedish)
Source: Region Uppsala, checked 1 October 2026.
Patient ratings by dimension
What the symbols mean:
- This health centre
- National average
- Margin of error – how much the number can vary
The wider the line around the dot, the less certain the figure, usually because fewer people responded. Read more in the methodology.
- Care and treatmentPatient survey · 94 responses82.1
Municipality 79.6 · Region 80.1
- Respect and empathyPatient survey · 94 responses89.4
Municipality 84.3 · Region 84.4
- InvolvementPatient survey · 93 responses84.1
Municipality 81.2 · Region 81.5
- InformationPatient survey · 92 responses77.5
Municipality 75.9 · Region 76.5
- Continuity – seeing the same staffPatient survey · 94 responses71.5
Municipality 69.3 · Region 70.4
- AccessibilityPatient survey · 94 responses86.3
Municipality 79.6 · Region 81.1
How patients answered, question by question
The individual questions behind each dimension, with how patients answered. Added depth that does not count toward the Vårdbetyg.
Care and treatment
How did you experience the care you received during the visit?
83.794 answers to this question
- Very good61 %
- Fairly good29 %
- Fairly bad6 %
- Very poor2 %
- Not applicable / Don't know2 %
How much trust did you have in the doctor?
81.094 answers to this question
- A lot55 %
- Quite a lot33 %
- Not much9 %
- None at all2 %
- Not applicable / Don't know1 %
Respect and empathy
Did you feel that the doctor took you and your health problems seriously?
85.594 answers to this question
- Completely70 %
- For the most part18 %
- Somewhat10 %
- Not at all2 %
- Not applicable / Don't know0 %
What was your experience of how the doctor treated you?
93.394 answers to this question
- Very good82 %
- Fairly good16 %
- Fairly bad2 %
- Very bad0 %
- Not applicable / Don't know0 %
Involvement
How did you feel that the doctor listened to you?
85.393 answers to this question
- Very well70 %
- Fairly well18 %
- Fairly badly10 %
- Very badly2 %
- Not applicable / Don't know0 %
How did you experience the opportunity to be involved in your care?
78.193 answers to this question
- Very good51 %
- Fairly good34 %
- Fairly bad6 %
- Very bad5 %
- Not applicable / Don't know3 %
What is your experience of being able to ask questions?
90.193 answers to this question
- Completely72 %
- For the most part24 %
- Not really1 %
- Not at all1 %
- Not applicable / Don't know2 %
How did you experience the opportunity for relatives to be involved in your care as much as you wanted?
79.093 answers to this question
- Very good20 %
- Fairly good13 %
- Fairly bad2 %
- Very bad2 %
- Not applicable / Don't know62 %
Information
Did you receive information that suited you?
79.793 answers to this question
- Completely51 %
- For the most part38 %
- Somewhat10 %
- Not at all1 %
- Not applicable / Don't know1 %
What did you think about the information regarding the next steps?
74.992 answers to this question
- Very good43 %
- Fairly good38 %
- Fairly bad11 %
- Very bad4 %
- Not applicable / Don't know3 %
Continuity
How well informed did you feel the doctor was about your medical history and previous care?
75.794 answers to this question
- Very well43 %
- Quite well43 %
- Quite badly10 %
- Very badly3 %
- Not applicable / Don't know2 %
How did you experience the opportunity to see a doctor you had seen before?
66.293 answers to this question
- Very good32 %
- Fairly good19 %
- Fairly bad12 %
- Very bad11 %
- Not applicable / Don't know26 %
How did you experience that the coordination with other care and services worked?
72.393 answers to this question
- Very well19 %
- Fairly well30 %
- Fairly badly5 %
- Very badly2 %
- Not applicable / Don't know43 %
Accessibility
How did you experience the waiting time until you could visit the health/medical center?
93.594 answers to this question
- Short (reasonable)87 %
- Somewhat too long9 %
- Far too long2 %
- Not applicable / Don't know2 %
How do you think it works to get in touch with the health/medical center?
80.393 answers to this question
- Very well51 %
- Fairly well42 %
- Fairly badly5 %
- Very badly2 %
- Not applicable / Don't know0 %
The figure is the same 0–100 scale as the dimensions above, per question. The distribution includes the Not applicable / Don’t know answer, so the bars add up to 100 %.
Waiting times
Primary-care waiting-time statistics from the National Board of Health and Welfare, August 2026. The figures are preliminary. The median is the midpoint, half waited less. Only assessment within 3 days and answered calls count toward the Vårdbetyg; the other rows are context. Not the same as the Accessibility dimension in the survey above.
- Medical assessment within 3 days
- 78%
- Medical assessment the same day
- 31%
- Median wait for an assessment
- 1 day
- Waiting time for 9 in 10 patients
- 8 days
- Answered calls (phone/chat)
- 98%
Month by month
The two measures that count toward the Vårdbetyg, month by month over the past year. The scale runs from 0 to 100%. A month without a figure in the source is left empty, and we never fill it in.
| Month | Share |
|---|---|
| September 2025 | 93% |
| October 2025 | 88% |
| November 2025 | 80% |
| December 2025 | 80% |
| January 2026 | 84% |
| February 2026 | 84% |
| March 2026 | 95% |
| April 2026 | 84% |
| May 2026 | 84% |
| June 2026 | 88% |
| July 2026 | 89% |
| August 2026 | 78% |
78% in August 2026. The same month, Uppsala County had 75% and Sweden as a whole 87%.
| Month | Share |
|---|---|
| September 2025 | 96% |
| October 2025 | 98% |
| November 2025 | 99% |
| December 2025 | 99% |
| January 2026 | 98% |
| February 2026 | 100% |
| March 2026 | 99% |
| April 2026 | 99% |
| May 2026 | 99% |
| June 2026 | 99% |
| July 2026 | 99% |
| August 2026 | 98% |
98% in August 2026. The same month, Uppsala County had 94% and Sweden as a whole 91%.
Source: National Board of Health and Welfare, primary care waiting times. Open data at the statistics database.
Waiting time by profession
The unit has reported assessments by a psychologist, a counsellor and a physiotherapist in at least three of the past twelve months.
How many in 100 had a medical assessment within 3 days in August 2026, by profession. Not part of the Vårdbetyg. The score’s waiting-time part uses the National Board of Health and Welfare’s figures for August 2026, all professions together.
- Doctor
- 79 in 100 (193 assessments, Sweden as a whole 89 in 100)
- Nurse
- 94 in 100 (36 assessments, Sweden as a whole 91 in 100)
We only show professions with at least 30 assessments in the month. With fewer, a handful of patients can move the figure a lot. 3 professions had too few assessments to be shown.
Source: Väntetider i vården, SKR (August 2026). Open data via https://vardenisiffror.se/. What to consider when reading the figures (in Swedish)
Do they take care of you?
Do you see the same staff?
Continuity in the patient survey: 71.5 – in line with the national average (70.5) · 94 responses
The share with a named regular doctor is not available as open data for this region.
Can you reach them?
Medical assessment within 3 days: 78%
Answered calls: 98%
Are you involved?
Involvement: 84.1 – above the national average (80.4)
Information: 77.5 – above the national average (74.9)
Patterns in open data, not judgements about staff. Averages for the whole unit, not your own wait. What we cannot measure is listed under What we can’t measure.
Contact and opening hours
Not part of the scorePhone0171-41 73 80
Opening hours
- Monday–Friday
- 08:00–17:00
- Saturday–Sunday
- Closed
Phone hours
- Monday–Friday
- 08:00–17:00
- Saturday–Sunday
- Closed
Location
Tulpanvägen 10, Örsundsbro, EnköpingView on map (OpenStreetMap)E-services
Register with Örsundsbro vårdcentral (1177.se)
Source: 1177 Hitta vård (the HSA catalogue), retrieved 11 October 2026. Details may change – check 1177.se.
Is something wrong here?
What is wrong? We only count which option you choose, nothing about you.
To tell us more, email hej@vardbetyg.se.
Patient fee. A doctor's appointment costs SEK 200, the same as at every health centre in Region Uppsala. Fees and the exemption card in Uppsala County
Trend 2015–2025
The results held steady 2015–2023.
From the National Patient Survey. The survey was redesigned in 2025, so 2025 is shown separately and is not compared with earlier years. The trend covers Primärvård (2015-2024); years without a survey are left blank. Small ups and downs that could just as well reflect who happened to respond count as unchanged, not as a change.
Where the municipality has at least 3 primary care units with comparable measurements, the municipal average is shown as a dashed reference line. The average is calculated on the same units throughout the series.
- Respect and empathyUnchanged 2015–2023 · 5 measurement periods89.42015: 82.0New measurement 2025
The municipal average in Enköping is unchanged 2015–2023 (average of 6 primary care units).
- InvolvementUnchanged 2015–2023 · 5 measurement periods84.12015: 72.4New measurement 2025
The municipal average in Enköping rose 2015–2023 (average of 6 primary care units).
- InformationUnchanged 2015–2023 · 5 measurement periods77.52015: 68.6New measurement 2025
The municipal average in Enköping is unchanged 2015–2023 (average of 6 primary care units).
- ContinuityUnchanged 2015–2023 · 5 measurement periods71.52015: 72.7New measurement 2025
The municipal average in Enköping is unchanged 2015–2023 (average of 6 primary care units).
- AccessibilityUnchanged 2015–2023 · 5 measurement periods86.32015: 83.9New measurement 2025
The municipal average in Enköping is unchanged 2015–2023 (average of 6 primary care units).
- Emotional supportUnchanged 2015–2023 · 5 measurement periods82.02015: 67.42023
Not measured in the 2025 survey.
- Overall impressionUnchanged 2015–2023 · 5 measurement periods81.22015: 78.82023
Not measured in the 2025 survey.
Was this helpful?
Basis
How many responses the Vårdbetyg is built on. More responses give a more reliable result.
- Response rate
- 63%
- Responses
- 94
- Surveys sent
- 150
- Reported results in the patient survey since
- 2015 or earlier
Independence: no care provider pays for placement or scores, no sponsorship, no submitted reviews. Only open sources: the National Patient Survey 2025 and the National Board of Health and Welfare’s waiting times. How we stay independent.
Below are facts and context. None of it counts toward the Vårdbetyg.
About the health centre
- Operating form
- Public
- Address
- Tulpanvägen 10, Örsundsbro, Enköping
Source: 1177 Hitta vård (the HSA catalogue).
Was this helpful?
Summary
AI-generated
Örsundsbro vårdcentral scores 83 out of 100 on Vårdbetyg, slightly above the national average of 81.2, based on 94 survey responses with a 63% response rate. Patients rated respect and empathy especially highly at 89.4 (versus 84 nationally), while continuity was the weakest dimension at 71.5, only marginally above the national average of 70.5. Accessibility also stands out positively, with 86.3 on the survey measure and 98% of calls answered at first contact, though only 78% of patients received a medical assessment within 3 days. With under 100 responses, these figures should be interpreted with some caution.
Automatically generated summary, grounded in the figures on this page (the patient survey 2025).
Was this helpful?
Context in Uppsala
Figures for the whole region, never this health centre's own.
Diabetes care
Share of the region’s primary-care diabetes patients reaching the target value, from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (2025). The row on high blood-sugar level is the exception and instead shows the share above 70 mmol/mol.
- Good blood-sugar control (HbA1c < 52 mmol/mol)
- 63%
- High blood-sugar level (HbA1c > 70 mmol/mol), lower is better
- 6%
- Blood pressure below 140/85 mmHg
- 69%
- Foot examination performed
- 81%
- Lipid-lowering treatment
- 81%
Source: the Swedish National Diabetes Register via Vården i siffror.
Antibiotics
Antibiotic prescriptions per 1,000 inhabitants in the region’s outpatient care. Strama’s target is at most 250 prescriptions per 1,000 inhabitants per year (2025). Lower is better.
- Antibiotic prescriptions per 1,000 inhabitants
- 237
Source: the Public Health Agency of Sweden, antibiotics statistics.
Complaints to IVO
Complaints to IVO about primary care in the region that were investigated on the merits, and how many were closed with criticism, in total 2018-2025.
- Complaints investigated on the merits (total)
- 58
- Of which closed with criticism
- 22
IVO investigates only a small share of all complaints on the merits (most go to the patient committee), and the count also reflects the region’s size, so it is not a quality ranking. Small counts are suppressed at the source, so the figure is a lower bound.
Source: the Health and Social Care Inspectorate, IVO statistics database (table EKPSL09, primary care).
Was this helpful?
What we can’t measure
Vårdbetyg is built only on open, year-stamped sources. Some of what patients care about most is not in any open data per health centre. When that is the case we say so plainly instead of guessing.
- Whether a clinic offers or upsells private add-ons.
- How often it refers or passes you on instead of caring for you itself.
- Whether it profits from rebooking you.
The Swedish National Diabetes Register does not publish its results per health centre as open data. In October 2026 we asked the register whether we may show them. The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SKR) publishes PrimärvårdsKvalitet, which among other things measures whether patients have a named regular doctor, only per region. For figures per health centre, SKR refers to the regions.
A missing figure like this does not mean anything is wrong with this particular health centre, only that it can’t be measured fairly in open data. We never put a number or a judgement on something we can’t substantiate, and never single out an individual clinic on a guess.
Have a concern about a specific health centre? Your region’s patient advisory committee (patientnämnden) receives it free of charge, and serious deficiencies can be reported to IVO.
Questions to ask the health centre (4)
This does not show in the statistics, but you can ask the clinic yourself. The questions are chosen by which figures we lack, and are the same for every health centre in the same situation.
- Can I get a regular doctor, and how many of your doctors are permanently employed? How a regular doctor works (in Swedish)
- If I need to see a specialist, how does the referral work and how will I hear back?
- What do things outside the high-cost protection cost, such as certificates?
- Do you make home visits, and how do you coordinate care with home care services for a relative?
Which of these would you most like to know?
We only count how many press each option. The answer is about the question, not about this health centre.
Ratings and reviews for Örsundsbro vårdcentral
The Vårdbetyg above is built on patient ratings from the National Patient Survey, a systematic survey that outweighs individual reviews. Fresh Google reviews appear as a standalone complement when available.
Other health centres in Enköping
Similar health centres in Uppsala
Health centres in the county with the closest Vårdbetyg, in other municipalities.
- Eriksbergs vårdcentral Vårdbetyg 83.1
- Capio Vårdcentral Liljeforstorg Vårdbetyg 83.7
- Praktikertjänst Ultuna vårdcentral Vårdbetyg 83.8
- Kungsgärdets vårdcentral Vårdbetyg 84.2
- Meliva vårdcentral Lindbacken Vårdbetyg 84.4
- Praktikertjänst BålstaDoktorn Vårdbetyg 81.6
Embed this rating
For health centres
Proud of your rating? Copy the code and show the Vårdbetyg on your own website. The badge updates automatically when new data arrives and links back here. No cookie, no tracking.
This is how the badge looks.Frequently asked questions
How good is Örsundsbro vårdcentral?
Örsundsbro vårdcentral has a Vårdbetyg score of 83.0 out of 100, which is a high score. The Vårdbetyg is a combined measure of how patients experience the health centre and how accessible it is, based on the National Patient Survey 2025 and the National Board of Health and Welfare's waiting-time statistics.
How is the Vårdbetyg score calculated?
The Vårdbetyg weights patient experience (the National Patient Survey answers) at 70% and accessibility (waiting times from the National Board of Health and Welfare) at 30%. Before the parts are combined, each is pulled toward its own national average when the basis is small (the method is called Bayesian shrinkage), patient experience by how many people responded and accessibility by how many cases the waiting times are based on. The combined score is not adjusted a second time. A health centre with a thin basis should therefore not be able to top the ranking by chance. The method is open.
How many people responded about Örsundsbro vårdcentral?
The Vårdbetyg for Örsundsbro vårdcentral is based on 94 patients who responded to the National Patient Survey 2025. That corresponds to a response rate of 63%. We always show the number of responses and the margin of error next to the score, so it is clear how solid the basis is.
Source: National Patient Survey 2025 (SKR). Open data at resultat.patientenkat.se.