Mölndal · Västra Götaland
Hälsa Hemma Vårdcentral has a Vårdbetyg of 80.5 out of 100 (a high score), based on 49 responses in the National Patient Survey 2025. That is 0.3 points below the national average (80.8), and rank 6 of 11 rated health centres in Mölndal. 100% of patients get a medical assessment within 3 days (May 2026).
Updated with the National Patient Survey 2025 · Waiting times: May 2026
Vårdbetyg
0,3 below the national average (80,8)
Based on 49 responses
Combined from patient experience (75,6, from the patient survey) and accessibility (91,9, from waiting times), adjusted toward the national average. How we calculate it.
Two parts, each first shrunk toward the national average by how many answered, then weighted:
Combined rating 80,5
Patient experience builds on the unit’s own answers about 62 %; the rest is drawn toward the national average for patient experience (78,2) because 49patients answered. Fewer answers means a stronger pull, so a thin basis can’t top the ranking on chance.
The Vårdbetyg is a combined score, not just a survey number: patient experience (the National Patient Survey 2025) counts for 70% and accessibility (waiting times from the National Board of Health and Welfare) for 30%, with Bayesian shrinkage toward the national average based on how many responded. How the score is calculated.
What the symbols mean:
The wider the line around the dot, the less certain the figure, usually because fewer people responded. Read more in the methodology.
Municipality 78,2 · Region 78,4
Municipality 82,6 · Region 83,0
Municipality 80,3 · Region 79,6
Municipality 74,7 · Region 73,6
Municipality 73,9 · Region 69,5
Municipality 80,2 · Region 79,5
Share of patients reached in time, from the primary-care waiting-time statistics of the National Board of Health and Welfare. This is the accessibility part of the Vårdbetyg, separate from the Accessibility dimension in the patient survey above.
The statistics are preliminary. Accessibility counts for 30 % of the Vårdbetyg (patient experience 70 %) and is based on waiting times – separate from the patient-survey ratings above.
Source: National Board of Health and Welfare, primary care waiting times. Open data at the statistics database.
Three questions many people ask when choosing, answered with the same open figures shown on this page. No new measures, no new score.
Continuity in the patient survey: 68,8 – in line with the national average (70,4) · 46 responses
Share of listed patients with a named regular doctor: 95 % (June 2026)
Medical assessment within 3 days: 100 % (May 2026)
Answered calls: 100 % (May 2026)
Averages for the whole unit (preliminary statistics), not your personal wait.
Involvement: 75,9 – below the national average (80,4)
Information: 69,9 – below the national average (74,8)
These are patterns in open data, not judgements about staff or intentions. Differences from the national average can have many explanations, and the figures say nothing about why they look the way they do. What we cannot measure is listed under What we can’t measure.
How many responses the Vårdbetyg is built on. More responses give a more reliable result.
Independence: no care provider pays for placement or scores on Vårdbetyg, and we carry no sponsorship and no booking commission. The scores are calculated solely from open, year-stamped sources – the National Patient Survey 2025 and the National Board of Health and Welfare’s waiting-time statistics – never from submitted reviews. How we stay independent.
Below are facts and context. None of it counts toward the Vårdbetyg.
A full count from the region’s listing register at the extract date (June 2026), not a survey or a rating. A low share can reflect how the clinic registers listings, and a unit with many elderly or chronically ill patients can have a structurally higher share. Not part of the Vårdbetyg score.
Source: the region’s listing register, released public record. How the measure is derived in the methodology.
Hälsa Hemma Vårdcentral scores 80.5 out of 100, essentially in line with the national average of 80.8, based on 49 responses (51% response rate), which is a fairly small sample so results should be read with some caution. Its strongest area relative to the national picture is continuity, at 68.8 versus 70.4 nationally, a small gap compared to other dimensions. The clearest weak spot is information, at 69.9 against a national average of 74.8, alongside survey-based accessibility at 73.3 versus 80.2 nationally. This contrasts with the separate waiting-time statistics, where the centre reports 100% for both medical assessment within 3 days and answered calls at first contact.
Automatically generated summary, grounded in the figures on this page (the patient survey 2025).
Ratings and reviews: the Vårdbetyg above is built on patient ratings from the National Patient Survey, a systematic survey that outweighs individual reviews. Fresh Google reviews appear as a standalone complement when available.
Share of the region’s primary-care diabetes patients reaching the target value, from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (2024). The row on high blood-sugar level is the exception and instead shows the share above 70 mmol/mol.
This is regional context, not this health centre’s own figures.
Source: the Swedish National Diabetes Register via Vården i siffror.
Antibiotic prescriptions per 1,000 inhabitants in the region’s outpatient care. Strama’s target is at most 250 prescriptions per 1,000 inhabitants per year (2025).
This is regional context, not this health centre’s own figures. Lower is better.
Source: the Public Health Agency of Sweden, antibiotics statistics.
Complaints to IVO about primary care in the region that were investigated on the merits, and how many were closed with criticism, in total 2018-2025.
This is regional context, not this health centre’s own figures. IVO investigates only a small share of all complaints on the merits (most go to the patient committee), and the count also reflects the region’s size, so it is not a quality ranking. Small counts are suppressed at the source, so the figure is a lower bound.
Source: the Health and Social Care Inspectorate, IVO statistics database (table EKPSL09, primary care).
Concerns about primary care submitted to the region’s patient advisory committee (2025), and the areas they most often relate to.
Cases per year (2023–2025)
This is regional context, not this health centre’s own figures. A case is a submitted concern, not a verified deficiency, and the count also reflects the region’s size. The counts cover health centres, not other primary care (rehab, child health services and so on), and health centres without cases are not part of the extract. Shares refer to categorisations in the region’s own scheme; one case can concern several areas.
Source: the region’s patient advisory committee, released public record.
Vårdbetyg is built only on open, year-stamped sources. Some of what patients care about most is not in any open data per health centre. When that is the case we say so plainly instead of guessing.
A missing figure like this does notmean anything is wrong with this particular health centre, only that it can’t be measured fairly in open data. We never put a number or a judgement on something we can’t substantiate, and never single out an individual clinic on a guess.
Have a concern about a specific health centre? Your region’s patient advisory committee (patientnämnden) receives it free of charge, and serious deficiencies can be reported to IVO.
Which of these would you most like to know?
We only count how many press each option. The answer is about the question, not about this health centre.
Health centres in the county with the closest Vårdbetyg, in other municipalities.
Proud of your rating? Copy the code and show the Vårdbetyg on your own website. The badge updates automatically when new data arrives and links back here. No cookie, no tracking.
Hälsa Hemma Vårdcentral has a Vårdbetyg score of 80.5 out of 100, which is a high score. The Vårdbetyg is a combined measure of how patients experience the health centre and how accessible it is, based on the National Patient Survey 2025 and the National Board of Health and Welfare's waiting-time statistics.
The Vårdbetyg weights patient experience (the National Patient Survey answers) at 70% and accessibility (waiting times from the National Board of Health and Welfare) at 30%. Before the parts are combined, each is shrunk Bayesianly toward its own national average, patient experience by how many people responded and accessibility by how many cases the waiting times are based on. The combined score is not shrunk a second time. A health centre with a thin basis therefore cannot top the ranking on statistical noise. The method is open.
The Vårdbetyg for Hälsa Hemma Vårdcentral is based on 49 patients who responded to the National Patient Survey 2025. That corresponds to a response rate of 51%. We always show the number of responses and the confidence interval next to the score, so the reliability of the basis is clear.
Source: National Patient Survey 2025 (SKR). Open data at resultat.patientenkat.se.