Närhälsan Gamlestadstorget vårdcentral

Facts about the health centre.

Operating form

Public

Operator

Närhälsan

Registered patients

14 099

Address

Säveåns Brygga 5, Göteborg

Source: Region Västra Götaland (open data, CC0) and 1177 Hitta vård (the HSA catalogue). The number of registered patients is from Region Västra Götaland’s open listing statistics (as of 2026-05).

Share of listed patients with a named doctor

100 %

Listed patients

14 063

A full count from the region’s listing register at the extract date (July 2026), not a survey or a rating. A low share can reflect how the clinic registers listings, and a unit with many elderly or chronically ill patients can have a structurally higher share. Not part of the Vårdbetyg score.

Source: the region’s listing register, released public record. How the measure is derived in the methodology.

Närhälsan Gamlestadstorget vårdcentral scores 76.7 out of 100 on Vårdbetyg, below the national average of 80.8, based on a relatively small sample of 71 responses (36% response rate), so results should be read with some caution. Its strongest dimension is Accessibility in the survey (90.5 overall accessibility score noted separately, though the survey's accessibility sub-score is 59.2, well under the national 80.2), while waiting-time data show 87.9% got a medical assessment within 3 days and 93.8% had calls answered at first contact, both solid figures. The weakest area is Continuity (60.4 vs. national 70.4), with Involvement (70.7) and Information (67.2) also trailing the national averages. Overall, patients report a somewhat less positive experience than the national norm across most survey dimensions, particularly around continuity of care and involvement, even though phone and assessment access appear relatively strong based on the waiting-time statistics.

Automatically generated summary, grounded in the figures on this page (the patient survey 2025).

Share of the region’s primary-care diabetes patients reaching the target value, from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (2024). The row on high blood-sugar level is the exception and instead shows the share above 70 mmol/mol.

Good blood-sugar control (HbA1c < 52 mmol/mol)

61 %

High blood-sugar level (HbA1c > 70 mmol/mol), lower is better

8 %

Blood pressure below 140/85 mmHg

64 %

Foot examination performed

73 %

Lipid-lowering treatment

68 %

This is regional context, not this health centre’s own figures.

Source: the Swedish National Diabetes Register via Vården i siffror.

Antibiotic prescriptions per 1,000 inhabitants in the region’s outpatient care. Strama’s target is at most 250 prescriptions per 1,000 inhabitants per year (2025).

Antibiotic prescriptions per 1,000 inhabitants

248

This is regional context, not this health centre’s own figures. Lower is better.

Source: the Public Health Agency of Sweden, antibiotics statistics.

Complaints to IVO about primary care in the region that were investigated on the merits, and how many were closed with criticism, in total 2018-2025.

Complaints investigated on the merits (total)

492

Of which closed with criticism

191

This is regional context, not this health centre’s own figures. IVO investigates only a small share of all complaints on the merits (most go to the patient committee), and the count also reflects the region’s size, so it is not a quality ranking. Small counts are suppressed at the source, so the figure is a lower bound.

Source: the Health and Social Care Inspectorate, IVO statistics database (table EKPSL09, primary care).

Concerns about primary care submitted to the region’s patient advisory committee (2025), and the areas they most often relate to.

Cases about health centres (total)

1 647

Health centres with at least one case

204 of 214

Share concerning examination/assessment

28 %

Share concerning patient involvement

12 %

Share concerning staff attitude

10 %

This is regional context, not this health centre’s own figures. A case is a submitted concern, not a verified deficiency, and the count also reflects the region’s size. The counts cover health centres, not other primary care (rehab, child health services and so on), and health centres without cases are not part of the extract. Shares refer to categorisations in the region’s own scheme; one case can concern several areas.

Source: the region’s patient advisory committee, released public record.

Vårdbetyg is built only on open, year-stamped sources. Some of what patients care about most is not in any open data per health centre. When that is the case we say so plainly instead of guessing.

• Whether a clinic offers or upsells private add-ons.
• How often it refers or passes you on instead of caring for you itself.
• Whether it profits from rebooking you.

A missing figure like this does notmean anything is wrong with this particular health centre, only that it can’t be measured fairly in open data. We never put a number or a judgement on something we can’t substantiate, and never single out an individual clinic on a guess.

Have a concern about a specific health centre? Your region’s patient advisory committee (patientnämnden) receives it free of charge, and serious deficiencies can be reported to IVO.